Fedora 28 ppc64le support
Description
Activity

Barak Korren June 26, 2018 at 1:02 PM
Adding as a blocker as implementing it will solve this organically.

Sandro Bonazzola June 12, 2018 at 8:34 AM
we want to expand testing for future updates, so I think having ppc64le support would be beneficial to the project.

Ondra Machacek June 11, 2018 at 7:59 AM
I am not aware anyone using it, so I think we don't have to do it now. Let's do it once someone request it.

Barak Korren June 10, 2018 at 7:08 AM
We never supported building on PPC64LE for anything other then EL7.
We can add support if it is desired, but since we managed without Fedora so far, do we really want to add support for it now?

Former user June 8, 2018 at 8:44 AMEdited
Indeed, for Fedora 28 the only mock version is x86_64:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=jenkins.git;a=tree;f=mock_configs;h=c9b60023cd1bfb8195517c588de8a20ab4282c2b;hb=master
We can create a config based on the existing fedora-26-ppc64le if we decide to keep ppc64le on Fedora 28
Details
Assignee
infrainfraReporter
Sandro BonazzolaSandro BonazzolaComponents
Priority
High
Details
Details
Assignee

Reporter

Hi,
I see python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 failing on ppc64le for fc28 due to: "Unable
to find mock env" error.
I tend to think we should have ppc64le for fedora 28 but I see that mock
config are missing in jenkins and also the mirroring of the repos for
fedora 28 ppc64le are missing.
We should either drop ppc64le jobs for fc28 or add support for it. Adding
Ondra to share his thoughts on this.
–
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>