add support for fedora rawhide in mock_runner

Description

Moving this to Jira.

On 15 May 2017 at 10:31, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15 May 2017 at 10:13, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sandro, what is needed to build and public ovirt-imageio for Fedora rawhide?
>>
>>
>> We miss support for rawhide in mock runner, within jenkins git repo.
>> Adding Barak
>
> Get we get a mock configuration for it from somewhere?
> They are building it in Koji so I guess they have rawhide buildroots already no?
>
> Is there any other special behaviour needed besides the proper mock
> configuration?
>
> –
> Barak Korren
> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
> Red Hat EMEA
> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted


Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted

Activity

Show:

Barak Korren October 17, 2017 at 9:29 AM

Fedora rawhide support patch merged

Sandro Bonazzola May 29, 2017 at 6:43 AM

I'm fine enabling Ci only for rawhide as default.
For the releases we'll need the stable versions anyway, doesn't make sense to issue a stable release for rawhide.
If single specific package requires to be tested on a stable fedora for some very good reason I would suggest to treat it as an exception.

Eyal Edri May 28, 2017 at 10:55 AM

I think we need to agree on the amount of Fedora versions we should support/run in CI.
IMO we should support only latest and maybe even consider only rawhide if it makes sense and working ( it will reduce our work to refresh Fedora OSs on each release which takes a significant amount of time both from dev and CI ).

Barak Korren May 15, 2017 at 7:50 AM

, lets move this here.

Fixed

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

Created May 15, 2017 at 7:36 AM
Updated November 1, 2017 at 10:03 AM
Resolved October 17, 2017 at 9:29 AM